Jump to content

Talk:West Bank

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Palestinian flag

[edit]

Doesn't its inclusion here violate WP:NPOV? Shoshin000 (talk) 08:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How? Selfstudier (talk) 08:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's a disputed area, and the State of Palestine is a partially recognized state.
Kashmir for example does not have a huge Pakistani or Indian flag on its page, as it would give an impression of partiality to a reader, thereby undermining the absorption of information. Shoshin000 (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Readers are not stupid children. It most certainly does not violate NPOV. Israel does not claim it is part of Israel, it is administered as occupied territory. It is part of the State of Palestine. Israel is also a partially recognized state and a disputed area for some people. That has nothing to do with it. Sean.hoyland (talk) 09:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fair points. I'll leave this here however: According to a 2020 report by Gallup based on data from the U.S. Department of Education, 54% of adults in the United States lack English literacy proficiency.
Anything that gives an impression of partiality should be avoided imo. Shoshin000 (talk) 09:32, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:FORUM Selfstudier (talk) 18:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 22 January 2025

[edit]
217.218.145.194 (talk) 23:31, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the muncipality site of tulkerem because i think thats hacked.

Not done... it is not clear what changes you want made, the word "tulkerem" is not found anywhere in the article. - Adolphus79 (talk) 00:07, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 January 2025

[edit]

palestine should be shown as a country on the map as any other country is...Its discriminatory against Palestinians. 27.63.22.90 (talk) 12:43, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Yeshivish613 (talk) 15:37, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Worth to mention

[edit]

Worth to mention

[edit]

1. In west bank, many of the territory controled de facto by militants, that not part the PLO. Source https://acleddata.com/2023/12/14/the-resurgence-of-armed-groups-in-the-west-bank-and-their-connections-to-gaza/ 2. The palastinain expanding thier habitats in areas C and building illegaly on national reserves that declered on Oslo record. Source: https://www.israelhayom.com/2024/05/19/palestinian-authority-rapidly-builds-illegal-city-in-judean-desert-nature-reserve/ 3. Oslo record was a "trap" as their leader that time Yasser Arraft called it "Treaty of al-Hudaybiya" means that they will eventually will broke them, and they failed to qualify their terms about de radicalization. Thats a qulified reason why areas B didnt transfered to the PLO 4. Israel public opinion changed drastically after oct7, seeing that no presence of israelis forces in Gaza, allowd the palastinains made it a giant terror base with tunnels every second house and ammunition, so isralis dont want another oct7 like massacre to happens near central cities along the internal broder of west bank 5. Public opinion of arabs in the west bank endorse Hamas by 72% according the polls and more than half opposing a 2 state solution, as "Palestinian National Covenant" incite to armed confrontation. 6. Israel is not part of Europe ICJ so its ruling is not relevant as one side policy. Ron akazr (talk) 11:06, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the "active arbitration remedies" notice at the top of the page. This isn't the place. Prezbo (talk) 11:43, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]